🔗 Share this article

The iPhone maker may have to allow competitors to run their own app stores on iPhones across Britain, after a decision from the competition regulator.

This represents a significant change to the company's infamous "closed system" where applications can only be downloaded from its own official marketplace.

But the UK competition watchdog has designated both the tech giants as having "strategic market status" - indicating they have significant control over mobile platforms.

Regulatory Assessment

The regulator said the two companies "may be limiting progress and competition".

But the regulator clarified it did not "find or assume wrongdoing" from the companies.

"Mobile applications contributes one and a half percent of the UK's GDP and sustains around 400,000 jobs, which is why it's essential these markets work well for business," commented a senior official from the CMA.

Around ninety to one hundred percent of British smartphones operate using the two tech companies' mobile platforms, creating what the authority calls an "effective duopoly".

According to current data, nearly half of UK mobile owners own an Apple device - which runs Apple's iOS - with the vast majority of the remaining users using the Android OS.

The Company's Response

The regulatory probe examined how dominant the companies' own applications are compared with competitors - as well as their web applications and platform software.

It is unknown what changes the regulator will seek to implement, but earlier it published guidelines detailing potential measures it could take.

These comprise requiring it to be more straightforward for people to switch between Apple and Android devices, and for both companies to list applications "in a fair, objective and transparent manner" in their app stores.

The Cupertino company particularly may be compelled to allow third-party marketplaces on its products, and enable people to download programs straight from developer sites.

This would mirror a similar ruling in the European Union, which previously took action against the company for restrictive practices.

Apple warned the UK could lose access to receiving updates - as has occurred in the EU - which the organization attributes to strict rules.

For example, some Apple Intelligence capabilities which have been launched in other regions are not accessible in the European market.

"Apple encounters intense rivalry in every sector where we do business, and we strive continuously to create the best products, solutions and user experience," the company said in a statement.

"Britain's implementation of EU-style rules would undermine that, leaving users with reduced data protection and safety, slower availability to new features, and a divided, less seamless experience."

The Search Giant's Position

Google device owners can currently use third-party app stores - though commentators say they are not as user-friendly as the company's official application marketplace.

The regulator's plan said the search company may have to "modify the interface" of installing applications straight from websites, as well as "remove user frictions" when using third-party platforms.

"There appears to be no the justification for today's designation decision," a company competition lead remarked.

The executive said "the majority" of Android users use alternative app stores or download apps directly from a creator's site, and asserted there is a far greater range of applications available for Google device owners versus those on Apple devices.

"Currently available are twenty-four thousand Android phone models from thirteen hundred device makers globally, facing strong rivalry from Apple's platform in the United Kingdom," the spokesperson continued.

Google's platform is an open-source operating system, which means creators can use and build on top of it for free.

The company contends this means it promotes competition.

But advocacy organizations said restrictions on these firms' dominance in other countries "are already helping businesses to innovate and giving customers more choice".

"Their dominance is now creating genuine problems by limiting options for users and market rivalry for businesses," commented a policy expert.